Les Firbank
  • Home
  • Themes
    • Ecosytem Services >
      • UK National Ecosystem Assessment
    • Environmental risk assessment >
      • Novel technologies
    • Food security >
      • Enhancing Food Security in Leeds
    • Monitoring ecological change
    • Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture >
      • Defining and measuring SI
      • Increasing the resilience of farming systems
    • Sustainable land management - The Nexus
  • Presentations, papers and links
  • Blog
  • Contact

The world's largest agricultural experiment?

3/11/2018

0 Comments

 
Last week, Nature published a research article from China. The approach was simple; smallholder farmers were asked to contrast two farming approaches, one their business as usual, and the other farming according to a crop management simulation, parameterised according to local climate, soils, and crops. The novel system outperformed business as usual, with increased yields and reduced fertiliser inputs. Where the research becomes really interesting, is its sheer scale. The field trails were fully randomised, and took lace over a decade, giving over 13,000 site years of data, over 3,000 per major crop. This research is part of a wider campaign involving 1,152 scientists, 65,000 extension staff, 138,000 agri-business staff and over 20 million small farmers, across 452 counties. 

I led the UK Farm Scale Evaluations of GM crops, and I thought that was big. But this is REALLY big. The advantage of this study size size comes from the more local and detailed analyses, supporting the sustainable intensification of farming at the local scale without losing the national picture. I’d be surprised if it can be repeated anywhere else in the world, it relies on the availability of a lot of resources coupled with an integrated bureaucracy. Just conducting the experiment is a great achievement; getting the data in, properly validated and analysed is, to me, simply awesome. 

To me, it also raises the question of the role of large scale experiments in agriculture. There is a perception that these experiments are not really needed, if we have intensive data recording over a large population of farms, coupled with some form of analytics to come up with some form of optimum management. I’m old fashioned, I tend to mistrust analytics. It’s very easy for algorithms to become misled by incomplete and biased data, it’s also very easy for them to fail to capture the key variables of value as farming and our environment changes. In other words, to me, even though the amount of data may be far larger than we have seen before, it is still subject to problems of bias and lack of completeness. But experiments were designed to address this problem; you decide what to measure and what to vary, and how to sample from a wider population without bias. This study supports my belief that experiments are still the mainstay of collecting evidence to support changes in farming. The challenge is to make sure the experiments are large enough, and conducted well enough, to be fit for purpose. 
0 Comments

    Author

    Les Firbank is an agro-ecologist based at the University of Leeds

    Archives

    April 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    March 2018
    October 2017
    June 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.